There’s a more accurate way to compare coronavirus deaths to the flu
If we measure flu mortality the same way we count covid-19 deaths, the picture becomes very stark
By Christopher Ingraham May 2, 2020 at 7:00 a.m. CDT
Months into the coronavirus pandemic, some politicians and pundits continue to promote ham-handed comparisons between covid-19 and the seasonal flu to score political points.
Though there are many ways to debunk this fundamentally flawedcomparison, one of the clearest was put forth this week by Jeremy Samuel Faust, an emergency room physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard Medical School.
As Faust describes it, the issue boils down to this: The annual flu mortality figures published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are estimates produced by plugging laboratory-confirmed deaths into a mathematical model that attempts to correct for undercounting. Covid-19 death figures represent a literal count of people who have either tested positive for the virus or whose diagnosis was based on meeting certain clinical and epidemiological criteria.AD
Such a comparison is of the apples to oranges variety, Faust writes, as the former are “inflated statistical estimates” and the latter are “actual numbers.”
To get a more accurate comparison, one must start with the number of directly confirmed flu deaths, which the CDC tracks on an annual basis. In the past seven flu seasons, going back to 2013, that tally fluctuated between 3,448 and 15,620 deaths.
Note that these numbers are very different from the CDC’s final official flu death estimates. For 2018-2019, for instance, the 7,172 confirmed flu deaths translated to a final estimate of between 26,339 and 52,664 deaths. Again, that’s because the CDC plugs the confirmed deaths into a model that attempts to adjust for what many epidemiologists believe is a severe undercount.
Sign up for our Coronavirus Updates newsletter to track the outbreak. All stories linked in the newsletter are free to access.
Now, let’s add a bar for this season’s covid-19 deaths, which as of this writing stands at 63,259, and which will be even higher by the time you read this. Note the drastic change in the y-axis to accommodate the scale of covid-19 mortality.
This year’s data are necessarily incomplete, as 22 weeks remain in the flu season. There are not likely to be many more flu deaths, as we are well past the worst of the season. But covid-19 mortality has plateaued at around 2,000 deaths per day. Where it will head next is anyone’s guess.AD
Using an apples-to-apples comparison, we can say that the coronavirus and the disease it causes, covid-19, have already killed eight times as many people as the flu. By the time we get data for the entire season, the difference appears likely to be at least tenfold, or a full order of magnitude.
The coronavirus, Faust writes, “is not anything like the flu: It is much, much worse.”
One of the most challenging things about this pandemic is making sense of the profound uncertainty surrounding the many quantities that might appear, at first glance, to be rock solid. On the surface, comparing flu and coronavirus deaths seems like a simple proposition: dig up the official numbers of both and see which is greater.How two doctors became central to the push to lift coronavirus stay-at-home orders: Recommended Watch!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/how-two-doctors-became-central-to-the-push-to-lift-coronavirus-stay-at-home-orders/2020/04/30/fd98b35a-abc6-4981-96dc-cc9a3bb5bc37_video.htmlDan Erickson and Artin Massihi became rising stars among conservatives circles after holding a now-viral press conference on April 22. (Adriana Usero/The Washington Post)
But that effort gets complicated as soon as you realize that flu mortality is not reported as a tally but as an estimated range, which is far different from the individual counts, based on testing and diagnoses, used for covid-19. And because we can’t test and diagnose everyone, those covid-19 deaths are probably undercounted as well. Soon, what once appeared to be a simple mathematical exercise turns into a mess of algorithms, estimates and uncertainty.ADhttps://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html
People encountering that uncertainty for the first time, as many of us are during this pandemic, are likely to react in one of two ways. Some cherry-pick a single number that comports with their biases, creating an artificial certainty to score political points or avoid upsetting their preconceptions. That’s what the politicians and talking heads using faulty flu data to downplay the outbreak are doing. Others throw their hands up and declare the truth to be unknowable, indulging in the cynicism that believes you can “make statistics say whatever you want.”
But rather than try to make sense of this uncertainty ourselves, there’s a third option: turning to the experts who’ve devoted their entire careers to these questions. We can listen to the epidemiologists and physicians, people like Faust and his colleagues, who are trained to draw the best possible conclusions out of uncertain data, understanding that those conclusions may have to be updated as new information comes in.
And while the experts might not all agree on some points, something like a critical consensus emerges if we listen to enough of them. Then, that consensus can be used to inform policy that helps save lives and protect the economy.AD
Coronavirus aid: What you need to read
Updated May 8, 2020
What you need to know: Personal finances during the pandemic | Paying your rent or mortgage | What to do if you’ve been laid off or furloughed because of the pandemic | Coronavirus stimulus check calculator
Impact: Airlines | Newspapers | Gig workers | U.S. Postal Service | 10 Americans navigating the coronavirus economy
Small businesses: How to get a small-business loan under the new $484 billion coronavirus aid package | Data shows nearly 300 public companies received PPP loans | The companies that got loans that didn’t need them
We want to hear from you: Are you waiting on a stimulus check, loan, or unemployment assistance from the Cares Act? | How has the coronavirus impacted your business?
Are you recently unemployed due to the pandemic? The Post has anew Facebook group to help you navigate what’s next.1.1k CommentsPAID PROMOTED STORIES
- What You Should Know About A COVID-19 VaccineAARP
- 14 Movies That Totally Shattered Celebrity MarriagesRanker
- Play this for 1 min and see why everyone is addicted!Vikings
- Plastic Surgeon Tells: “Doing This Every Morning Can Snap Back Sagging Skin (No Creams Needed)”Beverly Hills MD
- New Senior Apartments Near Madison Coming in 2020Senior Living | Sponsored Listings
- 20+ Celeb Marriages That Have Actually LastedBigGlobalTravel
Recommended byhttps://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.htmlMost ReadBusiness
- 1PerspectiveStill waiting for your stimulus check? You have until 12 p.m. Wednesday to give the IRS your bank information.
- 2April saw the sharpest increase in grocery store prices in nearly 50 years
- 3No deaths and an army of hospital workers ready to fight: A rural town’s prescription for a nation weighing what’s next
- 4Small business used to define America’s economy. The pandemic could change that forever.
- 5Infection rates were climbing at Nebraska meatpacking plants. Then health officials stopped reporting the numbers.
Power Up newsletter
All the Washington news you need — fast — from the White House to the Hill and other power centers. In your inbox pre-dawn, Monday through Friday.
- Policies and Standards
- Digital Products Terms of Sale
- Print Products Terms of Sale
- Terms of Service
- Policies and Standards
- Submissions and Discussion Policy
- RSS Terms of Service
- Ad Choices
- Home Delivery
- Digital Subscription
- Gift Subscriptions
- Mobile & Apps
- Newsletters & Alerts
- Washington Post Live
- Reprints & Permissions
- Washington Post Store
- Photos & Books